Yesterday the RSPB posted a blog about the death of an osprey chick that died when two staff members were visiting the nest to ring the chick. It’s an exceptionally rare incident and the blog is well worth a read for a bit of perspective, here.
[Photo of an osprey chick by Lewis Pate]

This unfortunate accident has been picked up by the usual game-shooting trolls on social media who are, unsurprisingly, using this story to incite the usual anti-RSPB rhetoric and cast doubt on the professionalism of the ringers, including calls for them to be prosecuted! One of the main instigators is Bert Burnett of the Scottish Gamekeepers Association, who crassly headlined with this sensationalist nonsense:
“OSPREY DIES, RSPB INVOLVED”
and went on to say:
“Careless behaviour by ordinary members of the public connected to wild birds can and does result in prosecutions, will those responsible for this birds tragic death feel the weight of the law?“.
By ‘careless behaviour’ he’s presumably referring to the deliberate and pre-meditated actions of gamekeepers who have been caught illegally poisoning, shooting and trapping protected raptor species year after year after year, crimes which of course should lead to a prosecution. That’s clearly quite different from the circumstances of this osprey chick’s death.
Inevitably, the trolls’ faux outrage has quickly moved on to the malicious abuse of anyone involved in raptor tagging projects and includes calls for the satellite tagging of raptors to be halted on ‘welfare grounds’, despite an extensive review published last year that showed there are currently zero grounds for concern.
What happened to this osprey chick was an accident. A tragic, horrible accident. Mistakes can happen, and, as the RSPB blog states, there will be a review of the circumstances and all recommendations taken on board to ensure the chance of this happening again is minimised.
The ringing team will be devastated. These are qualified, highly skilled and experienced bird ringers, operating under a hard won licence, motivated by the opportunity to contribute towards osprey research and conservation. That an osprey chick died whilst in their care will probably haunt them for a considerable number of years.
The vitriolic response from the game shooting trolls is entirely predictable. They don’t like the idea of raptors being fitted with any sort of marker, and especially not satellite tags, because they know that the data being generated by those tags are all pointing, overwhelmingly, towards the illegal killing of raptors on grouse moors, despite the shooting industry’s best efforts to hide these crimes. Any opportunity they get to try and discredit the RSPB and raptor workers, they’ll take it, as we’ve seen today.
Oh, and let’s not forget, some of these trolls were actually begging to be allowed to ring raptors in the Cairngorms National Park not so long ago, presumably with the idea of taking control of the data and hiding it from public view (hiding stuff seems to be one of their special skills – we’re still waiting to hear what happened to the dead red kite found on an Angus Glens grouse moor back in February). Their hypocrisy is staggering.
Before the trolls hyperventilate from their latest bout of frothing hysteria, they might want to take a breath and read about another incident where a species of high conservation concern died as a result of an unfortunate miscalculation by an expert ringing team, this time employed by the trolls’ comrades at the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT).
We weren’t going to blog about this because, having read the associated reports and documents, it’s quite clear that, like the osprey incident, the outcome was unintentional, but given the abuse currently being thrown at the RSPB ringers and anyone else associated with tagging raptors, this other incident demonstrates that, sometimes, things can go wrong, mistakes can be made, and lessons will be learned.
The case in point relates to a study of Capercaillie in the Scottish Highlands. Last year, staff from the GWCT fitted necklace radio tags to a number of Capercaillie, which resulted in the deaths of at least two male birds (a third bird has not been found). The necklace loops were the wrong size (way too large) and one bird got its leg caught in the neck loop and the other bird got its mandible caught.
Should we be calling for the prosecution of the GWCT ringing team? Should their licences be revoked? No, absolutely not. According to the reports we’ve read, the GWCT team quickly recognised their error and caught up the remaining tagged males and removed their neck tags. The incident was reported to the licensing authorities (SNH and BTO) who both conducted a thorough review and found that the ringing team had operated within the terms of the licences. The GWCT ringers didn’t deliberately set out to kill these birds, just as the RSPB ringers didn’t deliberately set out to kill the osprey chick. The Capercaillie died as a result of a miscalculation, nothing more, nothing less. Lessons have been learned, and as a result permission for anyone to fit tags to the necks of male Capercaillie has now been withdrawn (no such issues have been identified for female Capercaillie and special licences are still available for experts wishing to tag the females).
What was interesting about the Capercaillie incident wasn’t the actions of the ringing team, but the actions of the GWCT’s project management team. SNH raised serious concerns about this and as a result has now pulled out of this particular partnership. This news is of particular interest to those of us currently challenging SNH’s raven cull licence, as GWCT is heavily involved with the planning, data analysis and reporting of that ‘study’.
For those who will undoubtedly accuse us of peddling fake news, here are some excerpts from the SNH report:


What interests us about the Capercaillie tagging incident is the complete lack of publicity about these deaths, which occurred almost a year ago. This is a red listed species of high conservation concern, and yet we’ve only been able to find out about these deaths after several months of submitting FoI requests to various authorities.
Contrast the GWCT’s public silence with the RSPB’s response to the osprey death – a blog was published within a week of it happening.
But that particular point wasn’t our intended focus of this particular blog. Our point is that mistakes can be made, those fieldworkers involved will be inconsolable (whether they work for the RSPB, GWCT or anyone else), and none of them deserve to be on the receiving end of such caustic and malicious abuse, especially from those who work in an industry that doesn’t think twice about routinely and deliberately causing pain and suffering to wildlife, legally and illegally, in the name of a so-called ‘sport’.
Recent Comments