04
Oct
21

Grouse moor burning incompatible with Scottish Government’s net zero ambitions: new report

Press release from RSPB Scotland (1st October 2021)

Scotland’s climate targets are at risk of going up in smoke

Scotland’s hopes of meeting its Net Zero by 2045 goal to address the nature and climate emergency are at risk of failing unless the burning of grassland and heather moorland is more strictly regulated, and almost all burning on peat is banned.

A new report, published today by RSPB Scotland, warns that current muirburn practices are incompatible with Scotland’s net zero ambitions because of the importance of peatlands as carbon stores and provides evidence that the current voluntary Muirburn Code is not working.

Muirburn is the burning of heather and grass vegetation (usually to promote new growth) and is a land management practice typically associated with managing land for game, deer, and some agricultural purposes. It is currently “lightly regulated” with some outdated statutory regulations supported by a voluntary code of best practice – the Muirburn Code.

[Muirburn on a grouse shooting estate in Strathbraan earlier this year. Photo by a blog reader who wishes to remain anonymous]

The report calls on the Scottish Government to introduce licensing and regulate the practice to deliver on its 2020 pledge, and to implement this action before the start of the next muirburn season in October 2022. Without regulation the £250 million of public investment in peat restoration over the next decade is at risk of being seriously undermined and cancelled out.

With a month to go until the UN Climate Summit COP26 takes place in Glasgow, the report – How to prevent nature and carbon going up in smoke: Licensing Muirburn – highlights the changes to muirburn legislation and practices that are needed to help Scotland address the nature and climate emergency. It looks in detail at how a licensing system could work.

The report recommends that:

· new muirburn legislation should be implemented in time for the start of the next muirburn season on 1 October 2022.

· all muirburn, whether for gamebird and deer management or agricultural purposes, should be licensed by NatureScot.

· all licenses should be subject to full compliance with an updated Muirburn Code, which puts addressing climate change and nature loss at its heart, delivering Scottish Government priorities for native woodland expansion, peatland protection and biodiversity conservation. Any future breaches of the Code would invalidate licences.

· burning should be prohibited on deep peat soils, except in exceptional circumstances, and a 30 cm depth definition (rather than the current 50 cm) should be adopted for deep peat in line with recommendations from peatland experts.

· details of all muirburn licenses granted by NatureScot in future should be freely available.

In recent years, and increasingly because of the current nature and climate emergency, the costs and benefits of this land management method have been hotly debated. Burning on peatland can lead to a rapid release of stored carbon and a drying out of peatland soils, whereas healthy wet peatlands continually store carbon. Damaged peatlands can also contribute to flooding and affect water quality with significant public costs and can negatively impact wildlife and their habitats.

In November 2020, the (then) Rural Affairs and Natural Environment Minister, Mairi Gougeon MSP gave an official statement to the Scottish Parliament in response to the independent Grouse Moor Management Group Report. It said ‘In future muirburn will only be permitted under licence from NatureScot, regardless of the time of year it is undertaken. And there will be a statutory ban on burning on peatland, except under licence for strictly limited purposes such as habitat restoration.’

RSPB Scotland strongly supported this announcement but believes action to implement this commitment must be taken now and is calling for new legislation and an operational licensing scheme by this time next year.

The report released today reviews the effectiveness of current regulation as well as describing how a licensing scheme could be implemented and administered by NatureScot.

It concludes that unless swift action is taken to regulate muirburn then the public investment of £250 million over the next ten years in peatland restoration, announced by the Scottish Government this summer, is put at risk by allowing these, and other areas which should be restored, to be further burned and damaged. By preventing natural regeneration of trees and scrub, muirburn is also in direct contradiction of the Scottish Government’s ambitious targets to create more woodland cover.

The report also includes examples of muirburn, provided to RSPB Scotland in recent years by concerned members of the public, which appear to show burning on steep scree slops, burning of regenerating trees and juniper, and burning close to nests of protected birds such as golden eagles and peregrine falcons.

RSPB Scotland asserts that these are all likely examples of contraventions of the current voluntary Muirburn Code, providing evidence that self-regulation is failing and that the Scottish Government must urgently intervene in this area of land management practice.

Duncan Orr-Ewing, Head of Species and Land Management said: “In the current nature and climate emergency, it is now widely accepted that all land uses will need to change to play their part in addressing the climate challenge we are facing. In this context, and as part of a wider package of change in land use practices, we believe that muirburn must now be properly regulated. The Scottish Government proposes to licence muirburn and to ban burning on peatlands, which we strongly support. However, this should be done urgently and be in place before the muirburn season of October 2022”.

In this report, various recent cases are highlighted of what RSPB Scotland perceive to be contraventions of the existing voluntary Muirburn Code. Where self-regulation is failing, it is right that the Scottish Government should intervene. We hope that the Scottish Government will take heed of the recommendations in this report and move swiftly to implementing licensing for muirburn and a ban of burning on peat in line with their commitment last year. The upcoming COP in Glasgow next month will surely reinforce how urgently actions like this are now needed”.

ENDS

The report can be downloaded here:

The RSPB is also asking members of the public throughout the UK to collect information on any current moorland burning, or evidence of recent burning. Please click here for information. If you’re not into using a mobile phone app, there will also be a facility to report your sightings via a computer.

Meanwhile, Wild Justice is taking a legal challenge against DEFRA’s approach on limiting burning of peatlands because the campaign group doesn’t believe DEFRA has gone anything like as far as it must. An application seeking permission for judicial review of this policy has been submitted to the court and a response is due any day.

To be kept informed of Wild Justice’s campaign, please sign up for the free newsletter HERE


10 Responses to “Grouse moor burning incompatible with Scottish Government’s net zero ambitions: new report”


  1. 1 Jill Willmott
    October 4, 2021 at 10:33 am

    In Wales there have been many reports of fires during Covid, some of them involving miles of heather moorland, and many involving either arson or people with disposable barbecues leaving them unattended and abandoned.
    The amount of wildlife and ground nesting birds dying is appalling. Many teens during lockdown have become almost feral, and out of control, due to the lack of people on the moors.

    • 2 Simon Tucker
      October 4, 2021 at 10:39 am

      Deflection – old person blaming young people: sick of it. If young people are doing the wrong things it’s because old people haven’t brought them up properly or given them decent role models.

      • 3 Jill Willmott
        October 5, 2021 at 5:46 pm

        Actually, unless you live in Wales you wouldn’t know, but Covid has let more youngsters (and older ‘wild campers’) loose this year with ‘staycations’, and there has been much in the news about it.
        Many have just abandoned their gear like Festival goers, which tends to point to younger folk with money, (and moors) to burn, along with their wild inhabitants.
        I’m a long term camper, my children were brought up to respect the land and it’s creatures.
        Deflection, my ear!

    • 4 Mike Haden
      October 4, 2021 at 11:32 am

      I predict that once any ban on burning moors becomes law, there will be an exponential increase in discarded barbecue fires.

      And disposable barbecues will be another key piece of equipment will be added to gamekeepers essential tool kit(alongside rolls of roofing lead)

  2. 6 EricH
    October 4, 2021 at 11:43 am

    One of the arguments I have heard for muirburn is promoting biodiversity – it is pretty clear in areas where you can drive through a grouse moor the verges have more biodiversity than the managed areas. A recent trip to an unmanaged area of moor land revealed the biodiversity first hand; Slow Worms and Adders, Scots Pines and Juniper. I have down loaded the app and will probably (hopefully isn’t the best word to use) be adding some records soon. May I suggest this survey is promoted amongst none conservation groups; like mountain bikers, hill walkers and climbers etc.

    • 7 Les Angus Wallace
      October 4, 2021 at 2:32 pm

      I can well believe that. Juniper of course is highly fire intolerant, double cursed because it doesn’t like much grazing either. One of only three native conifers it’s been burnt off vast stretches of the uplands thanks to burning heather to boost grouse numbers. That’s also no help to the seventy plus invertebrate species associated with it. They once produced a pro grouse shooting video, one that tried to justify the culling of mountain hares, in which they laughably claimed they killed hares to protect rare stands of juniper. They of course totally forgot to mention driven grouse shooting’s contribution to its rarity in the first place.

    • 8 Keith Dancey
      October 4, 2021 at 4:32 pm

      “I suggest this survey is promoted amongst non conservation groups”

      Very good idea.

      Unfortunately, even some influential ‘conservation’ organisations will not be actively supporting a ban/license, the WWF being one:-(

  3. 9 Alister J Clunas
    October 4, 2021 at 1:01 pm

    An article by Lisbet Rausing

    https://standpointmag.co.uk/carbon-carnage-the-real-cost-of-the-grouse-shooting-industry/

    estimates that 10m tonnes of CO2 are emitted by the burning of Scottish grouse moors.

    This cannot continue. There is a climate emergency.

    Landowners trumpet the restoration of peatlands through ditch blocking and re-profiling while others continue to burn our peatlands for a niche sport that uses 12%-18% of Scotlands land mass while contributing a tiny amount to the rural economy. In contrast nature-based tourism is estimated to produce £1.4 billion per year, along with almost 40,000 jobs.

    All burning of our uplands needs to end.

    • October 4, 2021 at 9:59 pm

      It should be a condition of funding, if the public pays for peatland restoration, then burning should be banned.
      Its actually disapointing (though i suspect its pragmatic) that the report sets out to regulate rather than ban the practice. its also understandable that they focus on deep peat for climate reasons but there are other areas in the code which are designed to protect sensitive ecological issues but often ignored. The licence will need to be tight in all areas.

      Thin soils, summit heaths, water courses, screes and boulders….sensitive species…..issues that seem to be targeted rather than avoided. It might be better to define where burning might have a low impact and ban it everywhere else. These areas should be mapped and pinned to the licence….along with the plan which shows how they will undertake the work.

      Burning causes pollution, everywhere else it would fall under SEPA’s control…why should SNH be asked to issue licences outwith its legislative competence? After all there are non-polluting ways of managing these habitats that SNH recommend in the muirburn code.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 7,706,593 hits

Archives

Our recent blog visitors


%d bloggers like this: