10
Feb
21

With straight faces, gamekeepers complain about abuse

Is this the most ridiculous shooting-industry propaganda narrative ever?

It’s got some stiff competition, to be fair. Over the years we’ve seen the industry endeavour to clean up its public-facing image, superficially at least, and make some pretty outlandish (and largely unsubstantiated) claims about how welcome raptors are on game shooting estates, but all to no avail as the illegal killing of birds of prey on, er, game shooting estates, has continued on and on and on.

In desperation, because they know they’re losing public support as these crimes are exposed time after time, the latest tactic appears to be to present gamekeepers as innocent victims of abuse, presumably in an attempt to elicit public sympathy and support. How this is being done with straight faces I just don’t know, given the deluge of obscene abuse many of us receive, on an almost daily basis, much of it orchestrated by gamekeepers and their supporters in the shooting industry.

But more of that in a bit. For now, let’s have a look at the level of abuse being claimed by gamekeepers.

This propaganda/victimhood campaign began late last year just before the Scottish Government published its response to the long-awaited Werritty Review. We saw BASC Scotland proclaim that ‘as many as 64% of Scottish gamekeepers experience threatening behaviour or abuse from members of the public at least once every year‘ although this claim was recently debunked after a forensic dissection of the report on which it was based uncovered some apparent misrepresentation of the results (see here).

That’s not to say that gamekeepers don’t experience any abuse at all – they do, for sure, just like most people do from time to time, no matter what their profession (as a quick look on social media will attest), but there are different scales of abuse, from mild ridicule to actual death threats, and the claims being made by the industry were not an accurate reflection of the report’s findings.

The Scottish campaign also included a public letter written to First Minister Nicola Sturgeon by Mike Holliday, a gamekeeper from Perthshire and a BASC Working Group member, who complained about the online abuse he and his colleagues had apparently suffered from ‘animal rights extremists’. I’ll be writing more about Mr Holliday and his own behaviour and that of some of his colleagues on social media in due course.

It seems that the game shooting industry was pleased with the victimhood approach because shortly after the Scottish campaign, a similar ‘survey’ was opened in England at the end of November 2020. The results of that ‘survey’ (and you’ll understand why I’m using inverted commas in a minute) have just been published and guess what? More headlines proclaiming an ‘alarming increase in abuse’.

You can download the report here:

This gamekeeper ‘survey’ is very interesting. First of all, look at the partner organisations involved – BASC, Countryside Alliance, Game Farmers Association and the National Gamekeepers Organisation. Nothing unusual there, you might think, until you look at the number of partners who were originally signed up to coordinate this ‘survey’ back in November – what happened to the GWCT and the CLA? Their names/logos do not appear on the final report.

The next interesting thing to notice about the report is the date it was compiled: 16th December 2020. Funny how it’s taken this long for the report to be published. Mind you, had it been published just before Christmas it would have had to compete with the grouse-shooting industry’s disgraceful ‘advent calendar of hate’ – a malicious campaign, which ran every day from 1st-24th December, hosted by a nasty little astroturf group with a growing reputation for vicious online abuse (here), this time targeting charity workers, trustees, authors, conservationists, scientists, raptor workers and politicians – indeed anyone who has spoken up against the toxic grouse shooting industry – and this spiteful, abusive campaign was being shared daily by gamekeeping groups across social media – yes, those very same gamekeeping groups who are now complaining about, er, abuse.

You couldn’t make this up.

Or could you?

The ‘survey’ itself was not what could be called rigorous, in any sense. If you read the report it was sent out to 2,372 BASC gamekeeper members and to an undisclosed number of others via the other partners’ websites. In fact, the ‘survey’ wasn’t restricted to gamekeepers at all – it was available online and accessible to anyone to fill in.

How do I know that? Because I filled it in, and I’m not a gamekeeper.

I made some pretty outlandish claims in the ‘survey’ as you can see from the screenshots below, and at no point was I asked to provide (a) evidence of identity, (b) evidence of occupation, (c) evidence of any abuse I claimed to have received as a result of me being a [fake] gamekeeper or (d) evidence of any of the crimes I claimed to have witnessed.

I filled in this ‘survey’ simply because I wanted to be able to demonstrate how unreliable its results would be. Now the ‘survey’ findings have been published, the game shooting industry is once again churning out the rhetoric without even the slightest acknowledgement of its lack of rigour or its hypocrisy.

For example, BASC’s Head of Game & Dogs Glynn Evans is quoted as saying: “The survey reinforces what we have been seeing and hearing in the last couple of years. Attacks on the gamekeeping profession are unwarranted and highly damaging. Gamekeepers, like other job sectors, should be free to undertake their profession without fear of attack or abuse.

Much of this aggressive behaviour on the ground is a product of targeted campaigns by those against shooting. While debate and a difference of opinion is welcome, shooting organisations are calling on those against shooting to consider the consequences of their publicity stunts and social media campaigns“.

Good grief, is he for real? Does his condemnation stretch to his colleagues who have published targeted and abusive commentary on a young woman just because she happens to be Chris Packham’s step daughter (see here)? And this was published on the BASC website!!

And does his condemnation stretch to his own organisation or his ‘partners’ at the Countryside Alliance and GWCT who have campaigned relentlessly for the BBC to sack Chris Packham? Why shouldn’t Chris be ‘free to undertake his profession without fear of attack or abuse‘?

Out of all of us, Chris has drawn the most abuse from the game-shooting community and the extent and content of it is horrendous. In the next blog on this subject I’ll be posting some examples and it doesn’t make for pleasant reading but it does put in to context this ridiculous idea that gamekeepers are innocent victims.

UPDATE 11th February 2021: Gamekeepers lead disgusting hate campaign against conservationists (1) (here)

UPDATE 19th February 2021: Gamekeepers lead disgusting hate campaign against conservationists (2) (here)

UPDATE 17th March 2021: BASC Director Duncan Thomas apologises for misogynistic abuse (here)


20 Responses to “With straight faces, gamekeepers complain about abuse”


  1. 1 steve macsweeney
    February 10, 2021 at 2:34 pm

    Wonderful stuff, you and I would have worked together well.😂🤣🤪

  2. 2 Chris Green
    February 10, 2021 at 2:35 pm

    Raptors have been getting a fair bit of abuse as well.

  3. 3 R Stuart Craig
    February 10, 2021 at 2:59 pm

    Awe Diddums are the big gamekeepers scared??? I note there was not any question relating to how many of these “abuses” had been reported to the Police.

  4. February 10, 2021 at 3:45 pm

    I’ve met a lot of Gamekeepers. They’re probably referring to people like me when they talk of extremists. Of course I’d argue that the extremists are those who’s job is to slaughter wildlife. Out of all the Gamekeepers I’ve met I’ve yet to find one that seemed to be a reasonable rounded human being. Each and every one has been some kind of sociopath.

    You’ll forgive me if I don’t feel terribly sorry for them. They should try being a vegan wildlife activist and then they’d know what abuse is.

  5. 5 Tim Dixon
    February 10, 2021 at 4:03 pm

    Any thoughts as to why CLA and GWCT declined to participate?

  6. 6 David
    February 10, 2021 at 4:33 pm

    Thank you for that excellent presentation. It’s a great mix of your customary factual and reasoned argument plus a nice piece of mockery to make a very valid point. Isolated on my intimidating shooting estate you are an inspiration to me!
    Relatively new to this antagonism I see it often as a case of (our) facts against (their) propaganda and fake news. Let us take some comfort then from the fact that authority figures and organisations peddling propaganda and fake news seem to be going out of fashion. I feel the tide of time is on our side. We only have to keep getting our message across to the wider public.

    • 7 Mike Whitehouse
      February 10, 2021 at 7:15 pm

      Well said on all counts. I absolutely agree that involving and trusting in the good sense of the wider public is the answer. I think we are well on the way and that the so called £2bn pound shooting industry well knows it. At this time most people quote a pacifist Indian leader of great repute.

      People in all walks of life now understand what is actually going on so we will get there. No need then for PR companies, friends in high places or Eustace or Juniper pretending to be Knut, public opinion will out.

    • 8 Douglas Malpus
      February 11, 2021 at 9:09 pm

      David, Does your shooting estate suffer from persecution of predators and do you order gamekeepers to carry out illegal acts? But of course, David may be a pet gamekeeper of the estate and only carrying out orders?

      Doug

  7. 9 George M
    February 10, 2021 at 4:47 pm

    I find it difficult to believe that many people with risk abusing any armed man especially those who have a reputation for being aggressive at the best of times. The idea of any birders that I know … and I know a few … abusing a gemekeeper .. I’ve known a few of those too .. brings a brodd smile to my face… as if!!! hehe (No offence to either party :) )

  8. 10 A.N.Other
    February 10, 2021 at 5:54 pm

    I have an interesting snipet. I have a colleague, who is a shooter. Now our work email protocol is fairly relaxed and non work emails are tolerated (eg fancy a pint etc…). I was talking to someone who also knew this shooter and we were all working on the same project (scientific research ).

    I mentioned to this third person the issues around shooting etc and leant them Inglourous, anyway when the story of the satellite tag wrapped in lead appeared, I shared the link to both these people. The latter agreed it was very informative about the dark arts. The former (the shooter) accused me of abuse and pointed out his legal right to shoot and that he was passing the email onto HR. ( all the HR said was don’t send them any more emails like that)

    All I did was share a story the we three people had an interest in. Now I suppose that these people equate abuse with people, pointing out facts to them

    Oh and the shooter has dropped in my opinion since they can wilfully ignore evidence that doesn’t meet their preconceived ideas. A bad flaw to have when you work in scientific research.

  9. 11 Jimmy
    February 10, 2021 at 8:11 pm

    I’ve yet to meet a keeper who could be described as a “shrinking violet”

  10. February 10, 2021 at 8:39 pm

    Trespass….in Scotland…….pea and ham from a chicken.

  11. 13 R T
    February 10, 2021 at 9:39 pm

    It’s strange that people who devote their time to killing animals for ‘sport ‘, trapping, snaring , poisoning and generally causing terrible suffering to animals say that they feel like ‘victims’. Abuse of any sort should not be condoned and that includes the abuse of animals who are absolute victims of cruelty.

  12. 14 Spaghnum Morose
    February 11, 2021 at 8:45 am

    After a lot of years dominating big areas of land like Gods, scaring off the local neds, marshalling gangs of youths on shoot days, keeping energetic & bullish Underkeepers in line and holding court in the pub, lots of 50-something Headkeepers appear to be ‘hard men’. But it suprising how many turn out to be very brittle and really struggle when changes occur – like new Owners, new Agents, or difficulties within their own families. In my experience they are generally less adaptive to change, to contrary opinion or in fact anything they cannot control compared with the average bloke. That is why they are struggling with this ratcheted up campaign in the last few years. Just my opinion.

  13. 15 Jonathan Wallace
    February 11, 2021 at 6:56 pm

    Amusing to see that amongst the categories of abuse received, alongside ‘verbal intimidation’, ‘physical’, threat of arson’ etc is one called ‘politicians’. I am very intrigued to know what on earth they can possibly mean by that!

    The hypocrisy of the report and its promotion by BASC and others is breathtaking.

  14. February 13, 2021 at 2:01 pm

    To quote that “fine” old keeper’s saying..”if you fly with the crows youll get shot with them”….that kind of abuse is never justified.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 7,806,636 hits

Archives

Our recent blog visitors


%d bloggers like this: