22
Oct
19

Is SNH about to impose a General Licence restriction on Leadhills Estate?

Last week RSPB Scotland published a blog called ‘Why vicarious liability is failing to have an impact in Scotland‘.

Written by Duncan Orr-Ewing, Head of Species & Land Management, it’s the latest in a series, following on from the excellent blog challenging the Scottish Gamekeepers’ ignorance on satellite tags, written by Ian Thomson, Head of Investigations at RSPB Scotland.

Duncan’s blog is well worth a read. It questions the Crown Office’s recent decision not to prosecute anyone for alleged vicarious liability following the conviction of Scottish gamekeeper Alan Wilson for a series of barbaric wildlife crimes on the Longformacus Estate in the Scottish Borders.

It also considers the potential benefits of having the threat of a vicarious liability prosecution, and how this may have driven down the use of illegal poisons as a method of killing raptors, but been replaced by shooting and trapping methods which are much harder to detect.

The really interesting part of the blog, as far as we’re concerned, is the section on the Leadhills Estate in South Lanarkshire. Blog readers will recall this is where a male hen harrier was found with an almost severed leg caught in an illegally-set spring trap next to his nest earlier this summer. Despite the heroic efforts of a number of experts, he didn’t survive. The estate denied all knowledge and responsibility and nobody has been charged.

[The trapped hen harrier found on Leadhills Estate. Photo by Scottish Raptor Study Group]

Regular blog readers will know this poor hen harrier is not the only victim reported from the Leadhills Estate. The list is long and goes back more than a decade (e.g. scroll down this page). Duncan’s blog discusses some of the most recent incidents including the witnessed shooting of a hen harrier in May 2017; the witnessed shooting of a short-eared owl just a few weeks later and whose body was recovered; the discovery of a buzzard in 2018 that was found to have been shot twice; and the filmed buzzard that according to the RSPB was likely killed in a crow trap in January 2019.

Nobody has been charged for any of the above, but significantly, Duncan’s blog says this:

“We are advised that only now is an Open General Licence restriction, another sanction in the public authority wildlife crime “toolbox”, to be imposed here”.

SNH has had the power to impose General Licence restrictions since 1 January 2014. This was instigated by former Environment Minister Paul Wheelhouse in response to continuing difficulties of securing criminal prosecutions and was an instruction to SNH to withdraw the use of the General Licence (available for legal predator control) on land where crimes against raptors are believed to have taken place but where there is insufficient evidence to instigate criminal proceedings. The decision to withdraw the licence is based on the civil standard of proof which relates to the balance of probability as opposed to the higher standard of proof required for a criminal conviction.

This measure is not without its limitations, particularly as estates can simply apply for an individual licence instead which allows them to continue predator control activities but under slightly closer scrutiny.

SNH has only imposed four such restrictions since 2014 – a pathetically small figure when we are aware of at least a dozen other cases where a restriction should have been applied. SNH has claimed it is ‘not in the public interest‘ to explain those failures.

We’ve looked on the SNH website to see whether Leadhills Estate has been listed as having a General Licence restriction imposed (SNH does publicise the details when it imposes the restriction) but so far Leadhills Estate is not named. Potentially the estate has been notified and is currently in the period where it may challenge SNH’s decision, as per the framework for a General Licence restriction.

Watch this space.


10 Responses to “Is SNH about to impose a General Licence restriction on Leadhills Estate?”


  1. 1 Paul V Irving
    October 22, 2019 at 6:06 pm

    Whilst this is a welcome move it should have happened to this estate some years ago (and any individual licence refused) However there is a long history of person or persons unknown breaking the law on this estate although they may or may not be employees and as we are probably only aware of a relative few crimes compared to what may have been committed does such a restriction make anything other than a symbolic difference?

  2. October 22, 2019 at 7:14 pm

    Watching with baited breath

  3. October 22, 2019 at 8:50 pm

    As Duncan Orr-Ewing says, it has become increasingly clear that the steps taken by the Scottish government to tackle wildlife crimes have had a very limited impact. I am trying to tackle this in my petition PE 1705 presently sitting with the Environment Committee by suggesting the government takes the following steps:
    The Safer Communities Directorate to issue a new code of practice relating to the admissibility of photographic, video or audio evidence.
    Members of public acting as an immediate response to an unlawful act to allow the police ‘take over’ a reported event without authorisation, as the police can already do if they encounter an unlawful act.
    Inspectorate for Prosecution in Scotland to provide a report detailing the results of investigations and prosecutions of vicarious liability with a view to highlighting to the Safer Communities Directorate what further changes may be required to ensure that prosecution is more likely.
    None of these proposed actions depend on the publication of or consultation on the much delayed Werritty report, which seems to have stopped all activity in this area.

  4. 7 Douglas Malpus
    October 22, 2019 at 8:54 pm

    xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx

    Sickeningly pathetic.

    Doug

  5. 8 BanDGS
    October 22, 2019 at 9:37 pm

    Even if this were imposed, does anyone genuinely believe that predator control would cease? How would they even monitor that? [Ed: Thanks for your comment – the last part deleted as potentially libellous even though it looks like you made an effort for it not to be!]

    • 9 sog
      October 23, 2019 at 11:04 am

      I hope that the combination of satellite tags and the new legislation will stop the estates’ version of *the big boys did it and ran away – it wasn’t anyone here*.

      Plus it should generate adverse publicity, and the estates will know this.

  6. 10 Douglas Malpus
    October 23, 2019 at 7:07 pm

    I do hope that satellite tags will develop, to record loss of life and instantly give a distress/time/location signal.

    The technology will catch up with the criminals.

    Doug


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 5,549,372 hits

Archives

Our recent blog visitors