05
Jun
17

Scottish Gamekeepers’ Association’s response to eagle satellite tag review

We’re slowly making our way through the recently published Golden Eagle Satellite Tag Review.

What an incredible piece of research! It goes far deeper than answering the simple question, ‘Is there a pattern of suspicious activity surrounding the ‘disappearance’ of many satellite tagged golden eagles?‘ (Answer: an unequivocal YES). The authors, Dr Phil Whitfield & Dr Alan Fielding, deserve much credit not only for their forensic analysis and clarity of presentation, but also for the extent of their review, demolishing long-held myths about the supposed unreliability of satellite tags, the supposed harmful effect of satellite tagging golden eagles (at an individual and population level), and the notion that wind farms are responsible for the ‘disappearance’ of many satellite-tagged golden eagles in Scotland. If you have the time to read beyond the headlines in this review, you’ll be rewarded with some really useful information that exposes the grouse shooting industry’s interminable denial about what’s been going on, some of which we discuss below.

Last Wednesday, the day the review was published, the Scottish Gamekeepers’ Association responded with this official statement:

Statement (in full, as given to media early today): SNH Report into missing tagged eagles

A Spokesman for the Scottish Gamekeepers Association said: “Losing, on average, 4 tagged eagles per year across Scotland is totally unacceptable. The illegal killing of any eagle is condemned wholeheartedly by the SGA and all law abiding gamekeepers.

Although this study assimilates 12 years of evidence and makes difficult reading, it does acknowledge recent improvements in some grouse moors areas previously associated with suspected persecution. This change has contributed to the overall betterment of the golden eagle’s conservation status, as recently reported.

That said, problems clearly still exist in some hotspot areas and, in our view, this can only be tackled by all partners having access to the same telemetry data in order to arrive at shared and targeted solutions. If this had been happening over the past decade, there is a high likelihood these problems could have been tackled satisfactorily before now.

The SGA does not believe the report adequately tackles the threat wind farms pose to raptor species as there is a significant amount of published data from other countries which show a negative correlation between bird survival and turbine strike.

However, that is not an attempt in any way to detract from the report’s findings“.

END

The SGA says the report “made difficult reading“. It’s apparent, from their official statement, that the report also made for difficult comprehension (for them). They refer to recent improvements in some grouse moor areas which led to the golden eagle’s national conservation status changing from ‘unfavourable’ (largely due to illegal persecution) to ‘favourable’, as we blogged about here. However, what the SGA has conveniently forgotten to mention is the following statement from the golden eagle satellite tag review:

We also expect that there may have been some recovery in some parts of the central and eastern Highland regions where the species’ conservation status was previously unfavourable due largely to illegal persecution. These regions, however, still yield evidence of continued illegal persecution in parts, and so we would not expect recovery to the full capability of breeding birds being evident‘.

In other words, the recent improvements in some areas do not off-set the continued illegal persecution that is, quote, “still hampering overall recovery from historic, widespread persecution“.

The SGA does acknowledge that “problems still clearly exist in some hotspot areas” but then claim that “this can only be tackled by all partners having access to the same telemetry data in order to arrive at shared and targeted solutions. If this had been happening over the past decade, there is a high likelihood these problems could have been tackled satisfactorily before now”.

Eh? Are they suggesting that before the publication of this review, they were totally unaware of where these hotspot areas were? Talk about disingenuous. They’ve been made fully aware, for many years, of where these persecution hotspots are (some intensively managed grouse moors in the Monadhliaths, eastern Cairngorms, Angus Glens and parts of north Perthshire), through their participation in the PAW Scotland Raptor Group and also from widespread media coverage every time a sat tagged raptor has ‘disappeared’ or every time a raptor has been found illegally poisoned, shot or trapped in these, and other areas. Their feigned ignorance is ludicrous.

They argue that if they’d had access to the sat tag data, the illegal killing “could have been tackled satisfactorily before now“. How? By telling gamekeepers on the ground which tagged eagles are in the area so don’t shoot those ones? It’s worth remembering how the SGA reacted when they were given access to detailed information about one tagged golden eagle, that was illegally trapped on a grouse moor in the Angus Glens, suffering two broken legs as a consequence (both almost severed, according to the Golden Eagle Sat Tag Review), and then was moved, while still alive, in the middle of the night to be dumped in a lay by on Deeside 15km away and left to suffer an excruciating and miserable death (see here). Did the SGA accept the findings of the independent expert veterinary pathologist and come down like a tonne of bricks on the estate? No, they concocted the most outlandish explanation for what might have happened to that eagle and then slagged off the RSPB for suggesting a crime might have taken place (see here). If that’s the SGA’s idea of ‘tackling the problem satisfactorily’ then it’s no wonder the illegal killing continues.

Photo of the ‘Deeside’ golden eagle (RSPB)

This sat tag review has validated the long-held concerns of conservationists that parts of the grouse shooting industry are out of control, aided and abetted by the blind-eye turning of industry representatives, and this example is just one of many that shows the industry’s inability to self-regulate and why licensing is now very much on the cards.

The SGA’s response to the satellite tag review then comes back to one of their old favourites, wind farms. Not for the first time have wind farms been cited as being a more serious threat to Scottish raptors than illegal persecution (a myth we’ve debunked at least twice, see here and here). In the SGA’s latest statement it says:

The SGA does not believe the report adequately tackles the threat wind farms pose to raptor species as there is a significant amount of published data from other countries which show a negative correlation between bird survival and turbine strike”.

Dear God. Do they not understand that the potential collision risk of a wind farm will be calculated on innumerable variables (e.g. topography, altitude, wind speed, wind farm size, turbine size, species behaviour, etc etc etc) so just because a wind farm in one country has proven disastrous for some raptor species, it doesn’t then mean that all wind farms, wherever they are sited, are going to have the same negative impact. Of course there are issues, and these are well documented, but had the SGA bothered to read the in depth chapter on wind farms in this sat tag review, they’d have realised that wind farms have been ruled out for causing the ‘disappearance’ of so many satellite-tagged golden eagles. And not ruled out on a whim, but ruled out based on almost half a million location ‘fixes’ of 112 tagged eagles.

In fact, the review has more than adequately tackled the threat of wind farms to golden eagles in Scotland, and in addition to the review’s headline that ‘Wind farms were not associated with any recorded golden eagle deaths‘ the report also includes some startling revelations. Here are some direct quotes:

  • No ‘stopped no malfunction’ last fixes [i.e. abruptly ‘disappearing’ eagles] were within 1 km of an operational wind farm [see map below]. It is difficult to envisage a situation whereby a trauma sufficient to suddenly destroy a tag would allow a bird to travel afterwards for more than 1 km.
  • Moreover, records of tagged eagles close to wind farms were rare with only 0.005% of 360,711 fixes being within 150 m of an operational turbine. This indicated that even the risk of collision with a turbine blade was miniscule. Furthermore, it would add no support to a notion that technicians visiting turbines were discovering and then ‘covering up’ victims of collision, including moving dead birds away from the wind farm before, or then, curtailing the operation of the tag.
  • Overall, there was no evidence that wind farms were a direct or indirect agent of anthropogenic influence on the sudden tag failures of many young golden eagles. The reverse was more evidentially likely – that young golden eagles appeared to avoid operational wind farms.
  • Addressing the frequently heard accusation that wind farm technicians are removing and thereby ‘covering up’ the deaths of raptors that have been struck by a turbine blade, the report says: In Scotland this possibility seems remote given that: a) on incentive, the continued operation of no wind farm in Scotland is conditional on operational monitoring feedback in planning; b) technicians are not employed directly by the developer and are contracted independently by the turbine manufacturer and according to the projected lifespan of the wind farm; c) independent checks on reporting fatalities can be conducted at several wind farms by other contractors, and at least some developers (P. Robson pers. comm.) further blind-check these in staged exercises due to additional baseline legal requirements on environmental liability reporting; and d) many dead birds of prey (including tagged birds) have been routinely recorded incidentally by technical engineers and reported through several channels (e.g. Sansom et al. 2016, Urquhart & Whitfield 2016). In other words there are several checks and balances in Scotland to circumvent the possibility that carcasses of dead birds of prey would not be reported at wind farms and not disposed of once discovered (and even when relatively few birds will have been tagged). Nevertheless, our analyses were grounded to consider such a possibility; however remote.
  • Interestingly, and by contrast, from the many data sources we have received and examined, we are not aware of dead tagged raptors having being reported by managers or employees of game bird shooting estates in Scotland.

So, after trying to muddy the water with commentary about the potential impact of wind farms, even though the review has clearly shown wind farms are not implicated in the ‘disappearance’ of over 40 satellite-tagged golden eagles, the SGA’s official response to the sat tag review concludes with the line:

However, that is not an attempt in any way to detract from the report’s findings”. 

Really? That’s exactly what it looks like to us.

Presumably, then, now the SGA has been made fully aware of where the persecution hotspots are (certain grouse moors in the Angus Glens, Monadhliaths, eastern Cairngorms and north Perthshire), not to mention the other well-known persecution hotspots that didn’t feature in this golden eagle report (e.g. certain grouse moors in the Moorfoots, Lammermuirs and Lowther Hills), we can now expect to see the SGA setting up some ‘targeted solutions’ in these areas? Can’t wait.

Advertisements

17 Responses to “Scottish Gamekeepers’ Association’s response to eagle satellite tag review”


  1. 1 Gerard
    June 5, 2017 at 6:20 pm

    It’s kind of quite funny really, almost sweet, how they do this trying to “kill two birds with one stone.” They don’t like golden eagles or windfarms. How on earth do they imagine anyone is going to believe their pure wishful thinking.

  2. 2 Chris Roberts
    June 5, 2017 at 6:48 pm

    Gamekeepers (and their employers) are the single biggest threat to all our wildlife. They are not needed or wanted in 21st century Britain. Driven grouse shooting must be banned to protect all species, and the ugly muirburn hills allowed to return to a more natural state.

    • June 5, 2017 at 7:46 pm

      Well said, Chris. It amazes me that there are gamekeeping courses in colleges – wtf? A course in how to wipe out our precious wildlife!
      Oh – they try to dress it up of course – by squeezing in the word ‘conservation.’ Somehow they think that makes it palatable to us all…

      • 4 Macrude.
        June 5, 2017 at 10:05 pm

        Nope it’s a course in how to doff your cap to the estate owners and guests.

        • 5 Chris Roberts
          June 5, 2017 at 11:31 pm

          It is also a course on how to use the tools of the ‘profession’ such as poison, stink pits, shotguns, snares and all other traps. What a wholesome ‘profession’ it isn’t.

  3. 8 SOG
    June 5, 2017 at 9:18 pm

    Perhaps the SGA would like to demand the shutting down of windfarms on the high moors for a few years, in order to gain some data? I’m sure the landowners would be happy to co-operate.

  4. 9 Gerard
    June 5, 2017 at 10:11 pm

    I’m sure landowners with windfarms don’t want them shutting down, unless they get the money without the windfarm.

  5. 10 Mick Reavey
    June 6, 2017 at 6:23 am

    Surely SGA should be apologising for these crimes and publishing detailed plans on what they intend to do in order to stop this illegal activity immediately.
    It might rescue a small amount of credibility if they did.

  6. 11 RICHARD TOWERS
    June 6, 2017 at 6:53 am

    Absolute TWADDLE!!!

    How many of these raptors were killed as a result of tagging?

    How many clutch failures were caused as a result of tagging (see Springwatch)?

    • 12 Andy Holden
      June 6, 2017 at 10:35 am

      Richard, how would a raptor be killed as a result of tagging?
      If it was the case that raptors have perished due to tagging then I would imagine that the numbers would be very low compared with the raptors killed through persecution by driven grouse shooting management.

      Regarding the Springwatch tagging of the female Peregrine at Salisbury Cathedral; I had concerns about the female being disturbed whilst she was still incubating eggs, four of which didn’t hatch. It’s possible that those eggs were never going to hatch, but we may never know that, unless egg analysis has the answer.

      Tagging raptors, particularly Eagles and Hen Harriers, will benefit the species in the long run. We cannot afford to leave our raptors at the hands of the ‘conservation by game keeping’ idea.

      Anybody with knowledge of driven grouse shooting management will know that raptors are simply not tolerated on a shoot, resulting in the fact that the only long term answer to the success of our natural heritage is an outright ban on the Victorian pastime.

    • June 6, 2017 at 10:54 am

      Richard, you really need to read the report before asking questions if you want to avoid looking stupid.

      You asked: “How many of these raptors were killed as a result of tagging?”

      Answer (direct quote from the report): “On available information, we have found no substantive evidence that the satellite tagging of golden eagles in Scotland has caused any substantial ‘harm’ to the tagged birds, either physically, behaviourally or demographically”.

      You asked “How many clutch failures were caused as a result of tagging (see Springwatch).

      Answer: Er, none, seeing as the vast majority of golden eagles that have been tagged in Scotland have been of nestling age, not breeding adults. There are a handful of adults that have been tagged more recently and all have been trapped away from the nest. So far, no negative effects reported although the sample size of trapped adults in small.

    • 14 J .Coogan
      June 6, 2017 at 11:56 am

      Ah, Richard bless you, you are entertaining ” TWADDLE” haven’t heard that one since I eavesdropped on the butler gassing to the ladies maid.
      How many raptors are killed as a result of keepering – thousands.
      How many clutch failures are caused by the illegal activities of shooting estates – thousands.
      I’m afraid the filthy plebs are on to you, we are not fooled by your TWADDLE any more,Tally Ho.

    • 15 lizzybusy
      June 23, 2017 at 11:39 pm

      Richard, when bird’s of prey are tagged, special permits have to be obtained in advance and feedback reports provided on the outcome. I think the game shooting industry would be on the results like a shot if there were deaths and clutch failures as a result of this work.

  7. 16 Thomas David Dick
    June 6, 2017 at 3:32 pm

    Sadly, theres about as much chance of the shooting lobby accepting this factual research as of Donald Trump accepting man made climate change…but at least its out there, for those who live by actual facts and not just self serving rumour, including, hopefully some of our decision makers.

  8. 17 Wayne Law
    June 6, 2017 at 6:57 pm

    Is there such a thing as a ‘Law abiding gamekeeper’? Perhaps they abide by their own Laws?

    Well done for all your Sterling work guys. Without folk like yourselves, the enemy (let’s face it, 99% of landowners and their gamekeepers on grouse moors are) would simply wipe out all wildlife and raptors and then set every trap known to prevent them returning.

    #SportMyArse


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 3,282,565 hits

Archives

Our recent blog visitors