Scarecrow placed at peregrine breeding site on Northumberland grouse moor

An interesting case highlighted in the latest edition of the RSPB’s Legal Eagle newsletter:


5 Responses to “Scarecrow placed at peregrine breeding site on Northumberland grouse moor”

  1. 1 crypticmirror
    March 20, 2017 at 1:49 pm

    How blatant does it have to be for the CPS to take it to court? Or are they all too busy knocking off early in the Crown Office to go for a spot of shooting on a freebie?

  2. 2 Chris T
    March 20, 2017 at 1:54 pm

    If their eyesight is so bad they couldn’t see that, there is no way they should be able to keep their shotgun licence. Clearly visible for some distance in the LH pic. Perhaps we ought to go and stand in various places on the moor and see how long it takes the keeper to come and investigate? Could be there for months!

    • 3 Tony Warburton MBE
      March 20, 2017 at 3:25 pm

      This must surely qualify as the most risible report to date. Is the CPS manned by blind people? A gamekeeper who lies (not very cleverly) and is evidently incapable of spotting a high visibility jacket he placed on site himself, nor remember where – though he could remember where a Peregrine nest site was situated. What a coincidence he chose that very spot to place his scarecrow!!! (what a surprise that it wasn’t successful). And apparently, despite being a paid gamekeeper in charge of a Grouse Moor, he doesn’t know that Grouse don’t have second broods in July! If they did, presumably his clients would be informed to be careful not to disturb the nests on the (in)glorious 12th August, or tread on flightless chicks? Just what will the CPS take as evidence for a prosecution? I do hope the slapped wrist of the (un-named) landowner doesn’t sting too much! But well done and thanks to PC Jack, the NE worker and NRG representative. They mkust feel VERY frustrated.

  3. 4 John H
    March 20, 2017 at 10:32 pm

    As a licenced gun owner I would expect myself to be challenged by the firearms licence department if my eyesight was so bad I could not see a man sized object in a fluorescent yellow coat – and quite rightly so as I would be a serious hazard. If this man has admitted to being unable to see a human sized object in fluorescent clothing then clearly he is unsafe to have a gun licence.

  4. 5 Tony Warburton MBE
    March 21, 2017 at 12:08 am

    Well said John.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 4,209,621 hits


Our recent blog visitors