Scottish Moorland Group & BASC due to give evidence on licensing of gamebird hunting

Ah, now it all makes sense. We had wondered about the timing of yesterday’s article by the Gift of Grouse campaign, claiming that ‘raptors are thriving on Scottish grouse moors’ (see here). Why publish it when they did? There was bound to be a reason, and it looks like we’ve just found it.

The Scottish Petitions Committee is currently considering a petition from the Scottish Raptor Study Group (SRSG) urging the Government to introduce licensing for all gamebird hunting in Scotland. In October, the Committee heard evidence from the SRSG and RSPB Scotland in support of the petition (see here).

Following this evidence session, the Scottish Moorland Group (part of Scottish Land & Estates) and BASC wrote letters of complaint to the Petitions Committee accusing the petitioners of making “inflammatory and far-fetched claims” (see here) and asked for an opportunity to provide their own evidence, a request to which the Petitions Committee, quite rightly, agreed.

Yesterday, the Petitions Committee announced that evidence from BASC and the Scottish Moorland Group will be heard this Thursday (8 December 2016).

We suggest that yesterday’s Gift of Grouse article was timed to create favourable media coverage in the run up to this Thursday’s evidence session. Sadly (for them), the media coverage wasn’t as supportive as they’d probably hoped it would be, with RSPB Scotland denouncing it as “a pile of risible, make-believe tosh“.

Thursday’s evidence session begins at 09.30am in Committee Room 5 and can be watched on Holyrood TV here. We’ll be watching and providing a commentary shortly afterwards.


4 Responses to “Scottish Moorland Group & BASC due to give evidence on licensing of gamebird hunting”

  1. 1 Nigel Raby
    December 6, 2016 at 12:11 pm

    Oh RPS your so cynical, you don’t really believe they would stoop so low do you 😉

  2. 2 Alex Milne
    December 6, 2016 at 1:10 pm

    Well they have got the Dundee Courier on their side, as usual. No surprise there.
    I hope not to be disappointed by the debate, and looking forward to it.

  3. December 6, 2016 at 1:27 pm

    If you were “neutral on this – that is you hadnt seen the vast amount of confirmed reports of raptor killing listed in the archives opposite – you might well be wondering why they are so afraid of a mere licensing system, which exists in so many other aspects of our lives??

  4. 4 Tony Warburton MBE
    December 6, 2016 at 2:51 pm

    Am I being thick? It says they will be taking evidence from two of the high-up xxxxxxx – oh sorry, I should have said ‘representatives’ – but make no mention of taking evidence from the people with the correct evidence. Can you put me right again RPUK.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 4,162,344 hits


Our recent blog visitors