Petition calling for licensing of gamebird hunting in Scotland closes at midnight

ALMDThe petition calling for state regulated licensing of all gamebird hunting in Scotland closes at midnight tonight.

This petition was launched six weeks ago and currently has 6,601 electronic signatures and a few hundred more have signed a paper version at various events around the country.

We’ve blogged about this petition before but it’s worth repeating a few points:

The petition has been lodged by the Scottish Raptor Study Group and has the backing of RSPB Scotland (see here) and the Scottish Wildlife Trust (see here).

Background information about the petition may be read here.

Information about previous action that has been taken to address this issue may be read here.

The petition itself may be read here.

To sign this petition, please go here.

This isn’t the first time the Scottish Raptor Study Group has called for licensing. In 2014, they, with support from RSPB Scotland and the Scottish Ornithologists’ Club, called for grouse-shooting licences to be introduced (see here); a request that was rejected by the then Environment Minister Paul Wheelhouse (see here). That request was an informal one, put to the Minister in a letter. This time they’ve gone for a more formal approach and they need your support.

There is really no need to explain here why the regulation of gamebird hunting is long overdue. If you’re in any doubt whatsoever, just spend a few minutes looking through some of our blog posts and also have a look at the background information links above. The gamebird-shooting industry in the UK is the least-regulated in comparison with other European countries and, arguably, is responsible for more environmental destruction than any of its European counterparts. The UK shooting industry has had decades to get its act together and self-regulate, but has failed, comprehensively, and so enforced regulation is inevitable.

What’s interesting about this petition though, is how it differs from Mark Avery’s petition to ban driven grouse shooting (which so far has attracted over 116,000 signatures – see here).

The most obvious difference is that this new Scottish petition is calling for licensing rather than for a ban, and it is directed at ALL types of gamebird hunting in Scotland (e.g. grouse, pheasant, partridge) rather than just driven grouse shooting.

Some may argue that the licensing approach is futile, mainly due to enforcement issues, and we’d have to agree with that to some extent. Scotland already has some of the strongest wildlife protection legislation in Europe but enforcement problems continue to be of concern. Nevertheless, this new petition is still worthy of your support, and importantly, there’s nothing to stop you signing both petitions!

It seems the licensing approach in Scotland is considered to have more chance of acceptance by the Scottish Government than calling for an outright ban, largely due to the fact that the Scottish Government is, in relative terms, much more progressive and further down the road on this issue than the Westminster Government. This call for licensing is in line with the Scottish Government’s previously stated approach to the illegal persecution of raptors; they’ve been saying for years now that they are prepared to take further action if the persecution doesn’t stop, so this petition could nudge them in the direction they’re already travelling, because, despite the gamebird shooting industry’s claims to the contrary, the persecution has not stopped (see here).

It could be argued that licensing is just delaying the inevitable, in that if it fails to act as an effective deterrent, a ban must surely be on the cards, but we’d have to wait 10+ (?) years to get to that position because the Scottish Government will insist, quite rightly, that the licensing approach will need time before its success or failure can be measured. It does seem highly unlikely that the Scottish Government will support calls for a ban until all other options have been tried, so the licensing approach seems to be a necessary hurdle to be jumped, but if it does turn out to be effective then that’d be good, obviously.

If the Scottish Government does decide to accept a call for licensing, the next question will be, ‘What will that licensing look like?’. Who knows, and that’d be for the Scottish Government to decide in due course, but it might include restrictions on the intensification of land managed for gamebird shooting (i.e. restrictions on muirburn, restrictions on drainage, restrictions on medication) as well as new reporting requirements (i.e. How many gamebirds shot? How many predators legally killed? How many mountain hares killed?) etc. Crucially, whatever regime is introduced, it must be independently monitored if the public is to have any confidence in it.

But that’s for later discussion. At this stage, the most important thing is to apply pressure on the Scottish Government to accept that gamebird hunting in Scotland cannot continue in its current unregulated form. Whether you think a licensing scheme will work or not isn’t that important right now; the Scottish Government needs to hear from you that this issue is important to you and that you want to stimulate a discussion about it.

Please note: the Scottish petition may be signed by anybody, anywhere in the world.

The Scottish petition will close at midnight tonight. We’d encourage you to sign the petition (here), not only to support the views of the Scottish Raptor Study Group, but also to let the Scottish Government know that this issue is important to you and deserves Parliamentary time and attention.

Thank you.

The photograph shows conservationist Roy Dennis holding the poisoned corpse of golden eagle ‘Alma’, who was found poisoned on a Scottish grouse moor in 2009. There have been many more since (e.g. see here).


8 Responses to “Petition calling for licensing of gamebird hunting in Scotland closes at midnight”

  1. 1 Peter Shearer
    August 22, 2016 at 11:00 am

    Signed now-previously thought it was just for people living in Scotland.

  2. 3 George M
    August 22, 2016 at 11:07 am

    Come on folks … show your support for some of the most dedicated raptor volunteers in Scotland, the Scottish Raptor Study Group. Sign, share and drum up support. If they believe it to be worthwhile given the insight they have into this issue, then that’s good enough for me.

  3. 4 Les Wallace
    August 22, 2016 at 11:19 am

    I would add that a stipulation for game bird shooting estates, and this would mainly affect grouse moors, that in the interests of social responsibility they had to do the best they could to incorporate natural flood alleviation measures. These include demonstration schemes at Holnicote, Belford, Pickering, on the Tweed and also very progressive work pioneered by sheep farmers in Pontbren Wales. The work has involved tree planting, creating bunds, re meandering, ‘beaver’ dams and putting coarse woody debris in rivers which holds back more water when there’s a spate. They work. Formerly when there has been a major flooding incident that has affected communities there is frequently a tabloid response that it was due to the authorities not carrying out dredging work, if somehow conservation can be given as a reason for that then all the better. Almost always a complete and utter load of crap.

    We are now at a position with future flooding where we can say we knew that cheaper, natural flood prevention/alleviation schemes worked why weren’t they done as quickly and extensively as possible? The evidence is pretty incontrovertible that they work – it’s significant that since the last set of floods when these initiatives finally got the media attention they deserve Bert Burnett et Alia who used to come out with the predictable reactionary crap against natural flood relief now keep their traps shut on the subject. And where would implementing these new schemes be most effective, and most practical given they’d have less impact on genuine economic productivity? On our uplands of course, and where better than the grouse moors where the only ‘negative’ side would be compromising, maybe, the number of grouse people can shoot for fun. Much of the flooding that happened in Scotland last year had its source in rivers with a large part of their watershed in grouse moors i.e Deeside.

    So not a case of moving the goalposts to get at the estates, a very, very valid point why change is needed. What politician is going to side with them when the farms, businesses and homes of their constituents downstream will suffer more from flooding (not if when) not just because grouse moors are pretty crap at holding back water anyway, but they have obstructed work that would have made them far more effective at reducing flooding? It would be really good if the Scottish Green Party and FoES took this up – there is a definite need and role for them to do so. There is a parallel issue of our friends in the keeping fraternity pushing for the eradication of the Tayside beavers, and it seems some of them are actively contributing to it. In the not too distant future we could have widespread populations in upland areas making a dramatic contribution to flood prevention in areas which are currently over burnt/grazed moors. Each and every beaver in this country is incredibly valuable, we need them to build up populations over thousands of miles of streams and rivers. There’s an awful lot of conservation mileage pushing for this and it’s a bit of a no brainer flooded homes or more grouse shooting?

  4. 5 Bruno Clements
    August 22, 2016 at 2:36 pm

    Save our birds of prey!

  5. 6 Emily ward
    August 22, 2016 at 9:45 pm


  6. August 23, 2016 at 11:59 pm

    Please save these beautiful birds

  7. 8 Harris
    August 30, 2016 at 12:37 pm

    From the GWCT last week – http://tinyurl.com/hjw63eg

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 4,225,657 hits


Our recent blog visitors