No junior ministerial role for Environment

Roseanna Cunningham MSPFollowing today’s earlier post about Roseanna Cunningham MSP being appointed the new Cabinet Secretary for Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform (here), it appears that the former junior position of Minister for Environment has either been chucked, or has been merged with Roseanna’s new role.

Nicola Sturgeon has announced the appointment of other junior Ministers (see here) and there is no mention of a specific Environment Minister. Although obviously, Roseanna Cunningham, as a Cabinet Secretary, is also technically a Minister.

This news can be viewed in two ways. It could be argued that the loss of a junior Environment Minister position could be detrimental (depending on the effectiveness of that junior Minister, of course!) because it means there’s only one person responsible for the Environment portfolio instead of two. However, it could also be argued that the junior Minister (again, depending on who it was) could quite easily cause the Cabinet Secretary to take their eye off the ball of a particular issue if they thought the junior Minister had things in hand, and that junior Minister could then quite easily ‘dilute’ any progress that otherwise might have been made.

The very good news is, as we suggested earlier, Roseanna Cunningham is experienced, strong and decisive. And although her portfolio has been separated and former responsibilities such as agriculture, fisheries, crofting, and food & drink have now been given to another Cabinet Secretary (Fergus Ewing MSP), her remit is still pretty wide but has added emphasis on the Environment. We have every confidence she’ll rise to the challenge and do a better job on her own than the ineffective team of Aileen McLeod and Richard Lochhead.

We look forward to seeing what she can achieve.


4 Responses to “No junior ministerial role for Environment”

  1. 1 crypticmirror
    May 18, 2016 at 6:01 pm

    I quite like agriculture and associated trades being split off from Climate CHange Environment and Land Reform, there is a clear conflict of interest between them so keep a firm hard line by having different ministers arguing the case is a better thing. I quite like there being no junior minister too, too often there is a game of pass the parcel when it comes to dodging responsibility for doing bugger all or making cock ups, this way one person has responsibility and accountability.

    • 2 Alan Cranston
      May 18, 2016 at 9:29 pm

      I agree. In England, things have got ever more conflated and conflicted whether deliberately (as many suspect) or just carelessly ( as I still half-believe). Whatever the outcome is very bad, and so it seems there is much to be said for separation – especially with a strong voice for the environment.

  2. May 18, 2016 at 7:12 pm

    Better get her invite to hen harrier day in the post now…

  3. May 19, 2016 at 1:12 pm

    Not at all convinced that these are positive moves..particularly if there is no clear ring fenced enivironment role..and Fergus Ewing in charge of Ag and Fish with his history of connections to shooting estates and the SGA?..we are going backwards here…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 4,217,198 hits


Our recent blog visitors