17
Aug
12

Leadhills & Hopetoun: getting closer to the truth? Part 1

You may recall back in March we blogged about the RSPB’s baffling decision to hold their inaugral Scottish Birdfair at Hopetoun House. This decision raised eyebrows (see here and here) due to the alleged connection between Hopetoun Estate and the ‘notorious’ Leadhills Estate.

At the time, the RSPB defended their choice of venue by saying:

We understand that there is a clear separation between land managed in hand by Hopetoun Estate in West Lothian, and the Leadhills Estate, which is let on a long lease to American tenants. It is the American sporting tenants on Leadhills Estate, through a UK sporting agent, who employ and manage the land and the employees at this site, and who are therefore ultimately responsible with ensuring that birds of prey are protected on this land. We accept that Hopetoun Estate do not condone any illegal practices on their land.”

A spokesperson for the Earl of Hopetoun is reported to have said this:

The Earl of Hopetoun’s position on wildlife crime is unequivocal. He has constantly condemned any such activity. More importantly, Hopetoun Estate has no role whatsoever in the management of Leadhills Estate. Leadhills Estate is run on a sporting lease completely separately and there is no connection between Hopetoun Estate and the sporting management of Leadhills“.

Those last two sentences were designed to leave us in no doubt. We were barking up the wrong tree. Or were we?

We’ve since received a copy of a lease agreement made between the Leadhills Estate landlords (Andrew Victor Arthur Charles Hope, Earl of Hopetoun and his father Adrian John Charles Hope, Marquess of Linlithgow) and the sporting tenants (via the agency Leadhills Sporting Limited). The information provided in this lease suggests that the management of the Leadhills Estate grouse moor is perhaps not quite as straightforward as some have claimed.

Before we discuss the lease content, readers should be made aware that this particular lease may not accurately reflect the content of the current lease. The lease we’re about to discuss relates to a 20-year agreement (between Hopetoun & Leadhills Sporting Ltd) running from 2003 to 2023. However, five years into the lease in 2008, it was reported that the sporting rights at Leadhills were being sold on (see here). We understand that the current lease is for 16-years duration and is still held by Leadhills Sporting Ltd, albeit with a personnel change at Leadhills Sporting Ltd – Edward Dashwood & Mark Osborne, along with several others, had all resigned from the company by July 2008, and at least two new Directors were appointed in the same month. The big question is, was the content of the lease that we’re about to discuss carried over to the new tenants, or was the content considerably changed for the new tenants? This is important, because if the content wasn’t changed and is still current, then it looks like somebody might have been telling porky pies about the role of Hopetoun in the sporting management of Leadhills grouse moor. And we’re not talking those mini pork pies that you get in packs of six in the posh supermarkets. We’re talking big fat pork pies you get in your local butchers shop.

For Part 2, click here

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Leadhills & Hopetoun: getting closer to the truth? Part 1”


  1. 1 Pip
    August 17, 2012 at 3:55 pm

    Be that as it may – and all this seems to be fishing in some very murky waters indeed – I cancelled my membership with the RSPB over this and a few other matters over which I could not agree with their policies on and transferred my support to a different couple of conservation charities/organisations. But you never know, I might end up with them again some time……………………

    Pip

  2. 2 Circus maxima
    August 17, 2012 at 6:35 pm

    Who gets the grants…the estate or the tennent? Should be on the public record.

  3. August 20, 2012 at 11:13 am

    [Ed: first part of sentence removed for legal reasons] was recently brought up during an interesting meeting where a senior member of the Scottish Gamekeepers Association told a group of gamekeepers that “What’s actually happening now with this vicarious liability, if you go to court for something you did wrong, the laird has to show that he wasn’t complicit in whatever it was you were doing. To do that he will possibly want you to go on the courses so that at the end of each course you get a bit of paper and he (The Laird) can then turn around to court and say I put my keeper through the course and don’t know why he did wrong, I’m out of here. So what you probably find is that you will have to go on all sorts of courses, like coals to Newcastle, just so the Laird can say that you have been trained and he (The Laird) is off the hook. The Lawyer, [Ed: name removed], as far as I understand, has been hired by the Lairds to go around various places to give lectures on the law and so that the Lairds can say that my keepers know the law and so if he (The keeper) breaks it then it isn’t my (The Laird’s) fault”…….” [Ed: last sentence removed for legal reasons].


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 3,505,959 hits

Archives

Our recent blog visitors